It appears that the family that own Parklands were given permission to build provided that they had a facility for 'non members'.
They then allowed 'non members' in through the back door, literally a reception desk was placed at the rear entrance to Parklands.
Full members enter through the front door, non members go through the back entrance.
It would appear that the only facility non members can use, but still require to pay for, are the four badminton courts.
As stated ERC pay for the upkeep and Parklands take and keep the full amount of the public's fees to use the courts.
Is it only ERC that could work out this sort of deal?