Chief Officer (Legal and Procurement)
Council Headquarters
Rouken Glen Road
Giffnock
G46 6UG
As instructed by Anthony McReavy, CEO, East Renfrewshire Culture & Leisure Trust(ERCLT) in their email dated 14 September 2020 (attached) in response to my FOI request dated 17 August 2020 (attached below) and as Gerry Mahon, The Chief Officer Legal & Procurement, has previously stated that for the Council, FoI is normally a 2 stage process -
'As you will be aware the Council's response to an FOI request does not merely revolve around the initial request but also the review process. It is hoped that any human error in relation to the 1st part of the process is properly remedied at the 2nd stage.'
I wish to request said FOI review.
All of the exemptions in section 33 therefore section 33(1)(b) are subject to the public interest test.
This means that, even if the exemption applies, the information must be disclosed unless the public interest in withholding it outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information.
'22. In seeking to withhold information under section 33(1)(b), the authority must ensure that it sets out whose commercial interests are likely to be prejudiced, as well as the particular nature of those interests.'
I don't believe this has been done.
'The authority must identify and set out the competing public interest arguments....'
'Having identified the public interest arguments on each side, the authority must then carry out an exercise to determine where, on balance, the public interest lies. There is an in-built
presumption in FOISA that it is in the public interest to disclose information unless a public authority can show why there is a greater public interest in withholding the information.'
There is no indication that a fair and impartial public interest test has been applied.
The exemptions in section 33(1) (b) don't last forever.
If you’re using FOI to ask questions about public services involving private companies it’s quite common to be refused on the basis of ‘commercial sensitivity‘ .
The exemption is often misused by authorities as a ‘catch-all’ reason to fob off a requester.
There is a public interest test element which the authority is supposed to have thought through.
What Councils/ALEOs spend Council Tax Payers money on is always of public interest.
How Councils/ALEOs spend Council Tax Payers money is always of public interest.
The public interest is best served by openness and transparency, not secrecy.
There is no indication that a fair and impartial public interest test has been applied.
In seeking to withhold information under section 33(1)(b), the authority must ensure that it sets out whose commercial interests are likely to be prejudiced, as well as the particular nature of those interests.'
This information was presented to in the 4 March 2020 trust Board Meeting.
It is now 12 October 2020 some 7 months later !
I would opinion that in the circumstances as the Culture and Leisure Services Trust has a £1,758,000 overspend, and will have to be 'bailed out' by the Council, all the information withheld under Section 33(1)(b) should be made available.
Thanks